Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us

Water: Public Water Systems

Review of Monitoring Requirements for Chemical Contaminants in Drinking Water

[Federal Register: July 30, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 146)]

[Notices]

[Page 40709]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr30jy98-57]




[[Page 40709]]



=======================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY



[FRL-6132-7]





Review of Monitoring Requirements for Chemical Contaminants in

Drinking Water



AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.



ACTION: Notice of review of monitoring requirements.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



SUMMARY: Under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), as amended in 1996,

the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is, by August 6, 1998, and

after consultation with public health experts, representatives of the

general public, and officials of State and local governments, to review

the monitoring requirements for not fewer than twelve contaminants, and

promulgate any necessary modifications. EPA has, with the assistance of

a number of States and in consultation with the public and others,

conducted an extensive review of monitoring requirements for 64

contaminants as part of its chemical monitoring revisions (CMR) effort.

EPA published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) (62 FR

36100, July 3, 1997) that described a number of possible changes to the

current monitoring requirements for these chemicals and solicited

public input. The Agency received considerable new data in response,

and, on initial review, these data do not appear to simply confirm and

provide additional support for the revisions discussed in the ANPRM.

EPA is completing its analysis of these new data, and at this time has

not identified any necessary revisions to the monitoring requirements

for twelve of the chemical contaminants. Before publishing this

document the Agency consulted with numerous stakeholders representing

state public health and environmental departments, drinking water

utilities, environmental organizations, and public health service

representatives.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on the activities

related to this document, contact: Ed Thomas, U.S. EPA at (202) 260-

0910 or E-mail to thomas.edwin@epamail.epa.gov.



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA first regulated chemicals in drinking

water in 1975 by establishing maximum contaminant levels and sampling

requirements for fifteen contaminants. Thereafter, EPA revised the

standards for these chemicals and established new standards for other

chemicals in a series of drinking water regulations in 1987, 1991 and

1992. In the course of developing these regulations, EPA established a

Standard Monitoring Framework that was intended to provide a uniform

structure for monitoring requirements for current and subsequent

drinking water regulations; the Framework is currently in effect.

Because of concerns expressed that the Framework was too prescriptive

in some areas and too complex, EPA and a number of States began to

discuss ways to reduce unnecessary monitoring requirements and to use

chemical monitoring resources more efficiently. This activity was

referred to as Chemical Monitoring Reform. During this effort, EPA also

sought input from outside organizations through public forums. EPA

gathered one of the largest collections of sampling data then

available, representing thousands of public water systems. In addition,

several States volunteered compilations of their sampling results for

organic chemicals. While recognizing the shortcomings of these data

(which include the fact that they may not be representative of the

nation), EPA believed that the data indicated that relatively few

systems are contaminated and therefore revisions to the Standard

Monitoring Framework should be considered.

    CMR was based on six concepts: (1) some systems are not sampling at

the appropriate time of year or with sufficient frequency to detect

significant levels of contamination; (2) the percentage of systems that

are contaminated is very low; (3) public resources should be focused

more on the systems that are contaminated or at risk of contamination;

(4) because of their first hand knowledge, States are best able to

determine which systems are at risk of contamination and when sampling

is most likely to detect contamination; (5) source water protection

measures should be expanded; and (6) current monitoring requirements

should be streamlined. Thus under the CMR approach, monitoring

requirements would be consolidated, ``at risk'' systems would be

targeted for increased sampling, and sampling would occur when systems

were most vulnerable to contamination. The objective was to both

strengthen public health protection and reduce unnecessary monitoring.

    While EPA was developing the CMR approach, Congress enacted the

1996 amendments to the SDWA. These amendments reflected a number of the

issues being addressed in the CMR, and in particular, source water

protection. The amendments authorized States with a Source Water

Assessment Program approved by EPA to tailor monitoring requirements

for public water systems that had completed their source water

assessment under the State program. Prior to these amendments, the CMR

was envisioned as a free standing initiative for monitoring revision

and burden reduction. In response to the statutory changes, EPA

proceeded with separate but related activities: Development of

Alternative Monitoring Guidelines associated with source water

protection (which were published on August 5, 1997) and the CMR.

    In July 1997, EPA provided public notice of its plan to propose a

revision of the monitoring requirements based on the CMR. In the ANPRM,

EPA described in detail the sampling data it had gathered as well as

data from a number of States and other sources, and the possible

changes to the current requirements. The Agency sought public comment

on the CMR approach and, recognizing that the data used to develop the

new approach for monitoring were limited in scope, solicited additional

sampling data.

    In response to the ANPRM, commenters identified 17 potential data

sources. EPA has completed an initial review of these data sets and

presented a summary of that review at a stakeholders meeting on April

6, 1998 in Washington, D.C. On the basis of its initial review and

consultation with stakeholders representing state drinking water

departments, health advisory departments, water utilities,

environmental organizations, and public health representatives, EPA is

not able to say that the new data are simply supplementary data that

support and confirm the possible changes to the monitoring requirements

set forth in the ANPRM. For that reason, EPA believes it is

inappropriate to proceed with the ANPRM until it has completed its

analysis of the new data. Stakeholders at the April 6 meeting agreed

with this approach.

    Thus, EPA has completed an extensive review of the current

monitoring requirements for 64 chemical contaminants in drinking water

which covers the 12 contaminants referred to in section 1445(a)(1)(D).

At this time, EPA has not identified any necessary modifications to

those monitoring requirements for twelve contaminants.

J. Charles Fox,

Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.

[FR Doc. 98-20414 Filed 7-29-98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

 


Jump to main content.